Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lorne Larson who wrote (2911)	3/18/2002 10:13:58 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Respond to of 11633

Peter: Still lying aren't you. As the "resident doomsayer" I went net 80% long in early February. --------------- Lets look at the FACTS and see who is lying. And as usual it is you. In an early post of yours you state the lows were in fact 3 to 6 months ago. And it was then that you were net short. Check the postings. Its all there and all documented. Now you come back and say look at your Feb posts. You can't be that much of a complete idiot. BUT YOU ARE. -------------- -------------- Message 17196097. From your post # 2215. """"""let me state for the record that I am long PWI, AVN, and PVE - as I have stated before. I am short SHN, NCF, and yes, jackass, I'm still short ERF."""""""""" Now lets see after this you got scared and sold out of PWI at a loss. Your shorts, these above on record, have been disasters. So simple math would indicate that net you are in the hole. ---------------- I guess to you 80% long is "net short". ------------ You pick and choose and change what you look at when it is convenient for you to do so. You can't stick to one story. ----------- So at the real and documented lows when you should have been going net long you were net short. THATS FACT. SUPPORTED BY THE REAL AT THE TIME EVIDENCE. DOCUMENTED HERE -------- Ranks up there with your insisting against all the evidence that CDN oil and gas companies reported their sales in U.S. dollars, --------------- And that evidence pails in comparison to your getting the facts completely wrong about the trusts selling their stuff at huge losses. And that has a bigger impact on the trusts and unitholders and their pockets ---------------- and claiming an unrealized loss is not a loss. --------------- My claim was that an unrealized loss disappears so easily with a rise in the unit prices as we are seeing now. Your real losses never disappear. And they (real losses) shrink any gains you have going forward. Its interesting that you still will not comment on my going over your numbers and showing that you are worse off having sold PWI at a loss and then buying PVE. I and the others here understand completely though. The simple math of it (as I showed) shows you to be worse of. Check the numbers yourself if you have any balls at all. ------------------ I'm not sure whether you have some sort of mental defect or whether it's plain stupidity. By the way, I see you're still posting posts which say nothing except buy and hold forever. We've all heard it a 1000 times. Why don't you post some real hard cold opinion regarding a particular trust? Something useful instead of your usual blathergab. ------------- Once again as with my last post when you asked about PWI now. I referred you to my post at the time you were bailing. I gave exact ranges using the real trading numbers of what one should be doing then and now. Its in that post. Again you just ignore it as usual. I state what I do well before the fact. And it all comes to be as I have said. You on the other hand change your story each and every time by the use of hindsight and well after the fact. Your not fooling anyone but yourself. That you continue to do so again and again is just laughable. Especially when it can all be shown so easily. ----------------------