Poor russet!
Oh, my, aren't you bitter? You can dish it out, but...
"On DMX,...I'm only up a little Kayne, all on the long side...clearly you are the ultimate trader,..I bow to your superior skill."
If you didn't want an answer, why did you ask the question?..."...Better yet, how many shares you got in DMX and how much have you lost?"
So sorry to disappoint, russet.
___________________________________________
"I'd also welcome ideas on why our President Becky sold most of her shares and left most shareholders swinging in the wind "
As usual, you seem to have a little problem with the facts.
Trying to make some money on the short side, russet?
The shares appear to have been transferred - not sold - on Saturday, November 17, 2001.
If the shares had been sold, as I posted before, we would have seen the equivalent of more than 50,000 shares a day sold on the market over more than a month of trading.
There has been no such evidence.
Of course, that is a fact, and you haven't let any facts obscure your "Pronouncements From the Mount of Superior Knowledge and Insight" - so why start now?
I expect that the question will get answered at the AGM, if not sooner. As far as possible reasons go, if you had been following the dialogue at all, you would know them.
We'll assume that you and BBarf are blind, cannot read, and need to be reassured daily about things that bother you...
Let's start from the worst theories...
1 - REK has transferred the shares to some unknown entity, for some unknown purpose. People have speculated on all kinds of possible scenarios, including offshore interests, and her own personal offshore accounts - and worse.
2 - For tax purposes she did the transaction when the price was at the low. REK knew that the price was near its low. She knew that she would release news on the following Monday.
3 - REK has transferred the shares as part of the "creative financing" for the purchase of Oxo Chemie
4 - REK has transferred the shares to another family member, in trust, and does not want the world to know that the person will be (potentially) worth hundreds of millions.
AFAIK, this represents the sum of the theories.
You and BBarf seem to think you have discovered something that no one else has noticed. Believing in your supernatural powers, you both dredge the matter up continuously, and throw it into the debate.
It will probably surprise you and BBarf to know that may of us lesser beings would like to know, too. We didn't miss it, russet.
However, I would like to thank you both for continually reminding us, 2 or 3 times a month, ad nauseam. You are both wonderful people, and no one could possibly think you are bashers.
Yes, russet. We would like to know, too. At the AGM, the question will be asked.
_______________________________________________
re: "Marijuana Ingredient Helps Mice Overcome Arthritis (8/01)"
That's nice. I suppose the inclusion has a point, somewhere...
________________________________________________
"As far as my theories on DMSO,...they are based on the physical properties of the DMSO molecule, and its known effects on the human body,...many of which I have gleaned from your posts collected by the great Dr. Jacobs. I welcome a discussion with biochemists, molecular biologists, cellular physiologists, membrane biologists,...or similar "ist's" with a better idea of what DMSO will do in concentration in epidermal cells. Clearly you lack that knowledge, but I have some."
I suppose MB does not meet your lofty criteria. The former head of the FDA, of course, wouldn't have your knowledge and insight.
Your "discussion" >snort!< is not with me: it is with every reader on this thread - many of whom, - have conceded the possibility that you may be right, but have pointed out your lack of evidence.
Those who have responded to you all pointed out the lack of evidence for your theory. That's not good enough for you - you want someone with your higher understanding.
Perhaps - if you really want to discuss your unsupported speculation, you could communicate with di7026.
He can be reached at...
stockhouse.ca
We all look forward to your exposition of the failings in modern science...
As always, a pleasure, russet. Your posts are a delight.
Jim |
