Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lorne Larson who wrote (2921)	3/19/2002 9:36:17 AM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Respond to of 11633

Not one specific recommendation. --------------- I recommend when it is the right time to do so. I do not chase after gains. I get in well before the gains. As documented. While you wait and run after the rise when and only after it comes --------------------- Vague generalities and egotistical posturing. By the way, why do you continue to paste items regarding energy prices, if they are of no consequence to you? -------------- Because they are of interest to others. Because they show what is the exact opposite of what you had first said was going to for certain happen. That they were going to continue to fall and keep falling. And the trusts were going to stop paying out. Or go out of buisness. You concentrated on the day to day trying to get people to fear the worse when clearly doing so was not only not necessary. But would have made them do the wrong thing at the wrong time for the wrong reasons. And then to suffer for it. All for nothing. . Because they confirm the historical data I introduced to calm joe average. That prices cycle. They have and will continue to do so. Cycling is not a problem with the trusts it is to be played (least effort wise) and benefitted from. Not lied about that one will be able to allways buy at the lows and sell at the highs by trading or shorting. Then having your record clearly show that doing so is a guaranteed losing undertaking. --------------------------