Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (2318)	3/19/2002 3:13:21 PM
From: Return to Sender	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95536

No apologies necessary. If a reader hits the respond button and then pages down everything lines up perfectly for the reader from your post. I do it all the time with Don's excellent tables. The problem is with SI's software. It is not WYSIWYG (What you see is what you get) and it does not allow for complete HTML control. Thank you for sharing this information with the thread. The SMH is now closer than ever to the SOX due to the changes in the SOX recently. The original question on PE from Sun Tzu was if we could find a historical chart of the PE ratio associated with the SOX but the SMH should work as a very near substitute. From Briefing.com: 14:26 ET FOMC sets stage for a rate increase The description of the economy in the Fed's statement was similar to recent pronouncements from Greenspan that growth had returned due to inventories but that final demand growth was uncertain. But there was a hint of the rate hikes that are likely to come, as the FOMC prefaced its neutral directive with this clause - "although the stance of monetary policy is currently accommodative" - this is an implicit acknowledgment that a more balanced policy will ultimately be preferred. In a shift in disclosure policy, the FOMC also reported the vote on today's decision, which was 10-0 (these votes used to be reported with a 6-week lag). We have some profit taking now with the FED out of the way. Thanks, RtS

To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (2318)	3/21/2002 11:43:38 AM
From: Kirk ©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95536

EDIT; I apologize for format. It looks O.K. in preview. I will attempt to do PSR as well. Al Hey, GREAT work! I have found that IE doesn't do the tables right but I also have Netscape6 which does show the tables lined up properly... so I use Netscape6 to read this thread. BTW, Netscape6 has some MAJOR problems with Msft email and I can see why AOL wants to sue MSFT... not nice! They really do need to standardize email so when someone sends me a message with stationary it doesn't freeze my Netscape email. Kirk