To: SusieQ1065 who wrote (841 ) 3/20/2002 12:44:22 AM From: X Y Zebra Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2077 Remember, the biggest surprises occur when you are not expecting them. Exactly... and this is part of the reason that that comment from Zeev caught my attention as many are expecting some sort of rally as we are getting "out of the recession"... Well... Recession or not, under this uncertain environment, there is one left thing to trust and that is EARNINGS and its relation with price levels... Fortunately, QLGC does make money therefore, that could soften a potential disaster... by how much or at what level should QLGC reach? I do not know, as I do not know the future. I am skeptical of specific targets as there a million things that can change a specific outlook... I simply pay attention and attempt to follow what the chart is telling me... but there are times (with all due respect to the venerable gurus of Technical Voodoo), no one really knows... and even those very few who have some keen sense and feel of the markets, they succeed because they have developed a psychological sensitivity to markets that they literarily sense where a stock is going... I will illustrate with the following example (and this I relate to because I follow (and invest/speculate in this stock)... ACS... What follows are some comments made through the TC2000 daily comments by Don and Peter Worden (with some participation of the wide audience that follows their software), in this case, a client describes his recent experience with ACS Here it goes: Don, I would appreciate a few comments on the trading of ACS since Jan 18th. Several TC 2000 users offered some in Response to Milton's inquiry "Did I miss something", issued on Jan 28. The cogent well-presented remarks shown during the following days provided an interesting tutorial on the nuances and subtleties of technical analysis. I followed each observation judiciously to determine if the move was justified. Fear and Greed being the enemy of prudent investing, I found it necessary to seek further credible evidence. By the time I could do a thorough job, the stock plummeted 16% and was leveling out. As suspected there were no fundamental, macroeconomic, political or any other reasons that would justify such a draconian move. In fact the fundamentals had substantially improved during the last year, indicating that the earnings and revenue growth rate was accelerating from the previously experienced 25% annual rate to something around 40%. Usually to find something wrong is fast and easy to find, since it is usually an overlooked item. However, to find nothing wrong (or to prove a negative) is actually impossible and usually ends up as "a preponderance of evidence" issue. It appears short sellers "jumped" on the stock in response to the downgrade by AG Edwards from Buy to hold on Jan 17th. This was followed in a sell recommendation by a couple of other advisory services on the 24th after it was down 15%. It seems that the advisory services believed this performance was "too good to be true" in light of the poor economy and comparison to the high tech sector. However, the price performance portends negative earnings performance, rather than an error in the assessment of the advisory service. This result since the Enron and Global crossing experiences should not be unexpected. As Andy Grove once said "only the paranoid survive." Armed with this knowledge, a prudent investor would have seen by the head fake during the middle of February and buy signal on Feb. 27 a great opportunity was available. Instead of selling my ACS, I loaded up on some short-term options and was amply rewarded. Today's jump of 3.71 to 56.75 takes the price up to near where it would have been if the event had not occurred. I consider your TC 2000 as my most valuable tool, homing in on real or potential problem areas. Even after 6 years, I feel like a student anxious to catch up with everybody else. Thanks again for a superb product. Andy (Sir Gardener) ----- Sir Gardener was knighted on August 15, 2000 and contributed again on September 4, 2001. He is a retired rocket scientist. To follow what he is talking about here, you should refer to Milton's original question on whether to sell ACS, published on January 28, 2002. Answers for Milton appeared on January 29 from Sir Gambler and Squire Get Out. Two more answers on January 30 from Sir Kamran and Sir Zealander. On February 22, Sir Makis gave one more answer. ---- Personally, I think Milton was better off to take his profit as of January 28, which was my answer. Sir Gardener mentions a buy signal on February 27. Yes, but that was a month later and Milton's dilemma was history. During the month of February, the technical condition of ACS improved significantly, as a base was formed. During the basing, BOP worked up from heavy selling to light buying. TSV formed an excellent bullish divergence. A one-day reversal occurred on February 25, coming off the bottom, and a breakout occurred on February 28. It was a new ball game for Milton and anybody else interested in the stock. Sir Gardener was one who adroitly exploited the opportunity. You don't need to be a rocket scientist to trade stocks - but it helps. -DW Comment by Don Worden: Did They Hold the Meeting? There was so little change in the market's behavior today, one might have thought Alan didn't turn up for the meeting - or at least forgot to bring his clarinet. The major averages were up - not by much, but up. Breadth, sector by sector, was positive, in most cases stronger than the net changes of the averages. The SP-500 seems to be on the verge of an important breakout - above this year's high and above the highs of last year's fourth quarter. A decisive move to, say, above 1200 would mark an end to the major downtrend and the beginning of a major uptrend. -DW **Imagine what would happen if such move in the S&P gets rejected ?... And my point... One must pay attention to potentially significant influences to the market... yet, somehow, we must strive to apply a degree of common sense... what has what value and why one must ask at all times.... On QLGC: Earnings (12 m trailing) .81/per sh. Earnings (most recent Q) .18/p Book value $ 6.40 Cash $ 4.88 P/E 57.40 (oopssss) No dividend Optionable Y 52 week high $ 66.26 52 week low $17.21 Recent prie $46.72 Beta 2.93 MKT CAP 4.34 bILLION Daily volume (3 month ) average: 20.5 m Daily volume (10 day avge) 10.8 m 52 WEEK change +53.8 % 52 week change (relative to S&P) +54.5 %