Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack II - A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Casaubon who wrote (32631)	3/20/2002 3:42:34 PM
From: TechTrader42	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 52237

I'm busily exploring an entirely new avenue in TA, Casaubon, so everything isn't all kiddin' around. The fruit of my latest work: I really think the Dow could gap higher this morning (yes, this Wednesday morning, March 20, 2002) and continue up strongly to 11,000 during the day, based on Tuesday's momentum. Analysts are frequently wrong with their endless predictions, and always right in hindsight, it seems, but how many are absolutely wrong even in hindsight? I think I've chanced upon an entirely new angle in TA, and perhaps a profitable one at that. (I'm thinking newsletter here, and maybe a losing hedge fund or two.) I'll offer the same wrong predictions you're so used to seeing day after day, but now in hindsight, to make them doubly wrong, inexplicably wrong, dumbfoundingly, stupefyingly wrong. Somehow, wrongness in hindsight seems more authentic, since it starts from the basic premise that it's kidding itself. Wrong predictions about the future rarely seem to start with that honest realization. Subscribe now to The Wrong Newsletter. "We can't even get it right in hindsight."