Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (3888)	3/21/2002 2:25:10 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

I think if DNA exists in a case, it should be a legal requirement that it matched to the suspect. Bravo. I would only add that the whole emergence of DNA technology is fraught with risk. Leaving aside the obvious in the oj trial (when I heard the verdict I practically went into shock), it did alert us to the obvious fact that DNA can be planted...even by average people. Indeed, dna is such an incredible marker of presence that it begs recognition as a tool of those who are forever trying to outwit society for their pitiful ends...sometimes successfully. So far, it has pulled a few people out of the fire. I have no doubt, however, that it will soon strap some ne'er do well or vagrant into the chair..if it has not already done so. Like most swords, it can cut with either edge. It is a real challenge for the justice system to see that this amazing technology remains a servant, not a master...