Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (3927)	3/21/2002 11:23:46 AM
From: J. C. Dithers	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

Have you ever taken the time to read about the Tafero case? Here is one site favorable to him: lairdcarlson.com Note that Jacobs was not "found innocent," she was released on a plea-bargain. Note that Rhodes handed the gun to Tafero after the shooting so that he (Rhodes) could drive the stolen patrol car. Tafero has the gun now. Did he use it to stop Rhodes from all the further mayhem? The most Tafero would have gotten out of an overturned conviction was a new trial. And in the new trial he would have been easily convicted again under the felony murder law. He would have been convicted because he was clearly a participant in numerous felonies that involved a double-murder of police officers. He would have convicted because he was clearly guilty, not innocent. He might well have gotten the death penalty a second time. Because he was clearly GUILTY.Because he was not "INNOCENT"!! If you can't see the facts before your eyes, or are simply in a state of denial, there's nothing more to talk about.