SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GraceZ who wrote (17179)3/21/2002 12:04:11 PM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
The market builds expensive properties for the ones that can afford to buy without resorting to mortgages.
You have to know that Brazil has the sixth worse income distribution in the planet. So there is available a small amount of people with a hell of money.

But the deficit of housing (for the formal economy at least, because you may have already guessed that with such brutal distribution of income there are a lot of people that can't afford proper shelter) was taken care this way:

There was hyper-inflation up to 1994. Then, property was hedge against inflation so there wasn't much a deficit of housing because people keep value in bricks and mortar.

Countries with stable currencies tend to have deficit of housing: Japan, Germany and France are case in point. With stable currencies there isn't much need to hedge against inflation owning property.



To: GraceZ who wrote (17179)3/21/2002 3:30:48 PM
From: LLCF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
<I wouldn't hold a mortgage either with those rates. What effect has that had on the price of houses? >

Tut tut tut... remember from you post... it depends on the rate of appreciation of the asset!

BTW... this looks familiar... someone around here said this:

<<"Debt is fixed, while asset values aren't," says Levy.>>

fortune.com

DAK