SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (75259)3/22/2002 1:08:35 AM
From: Mani1Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
Re <<I'm just trying to point out that there is little evidence to claim it is already a success as some here seem to think.>>

Very true. As promising as Hammer may sound, it is far from a success. There has been so much media lately about Merced being a failure and how this leaves the door open for Hammer. Doors have been open in the past. Also, what is to say Hammer won't be the next Merced. Yes the die is smaller and it won't need brand new code, but AMD has only a fraction of money to make it a success. I am concerned than the success of the Athlon core may have gotten to AMD's head.

Mani



To: Elmer who wrote (75259)3/22/2002 8:20:28 AM
From: Dan3Respond to of 275872
 
Re: Let me just finish by saying I'm not trying to say Hammer is a failure. I have no data to support that claim. I'm just trying to point out that there is little evidence to claim it is already a success as some here seem to think.

Meanwhile, there is solid data that the first iteration of Itanic, at least, is a disastrous failure.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News