SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (43341)3/22/2002 8:03:37 PM
From: Shack  Respond to of 99280
 
What am I missing Mike? Most stocks were down today. but the ones that were up did a disproportionate amount of volume. CSCO, SUNW and PALM specifically, with the two formers selling off until they were almost down.

I don't think it matters which stocks did it. I am only pointing out that looking at the low Nasdaq TRIN as a sign of accumulation today could be a mistake.



To: mishedlo who wrote (43341)3/22/2002 8:04:51 PM
From: The Freep  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
<<Are you telling me PALM matched the volume of MSFT INTC QCOM BTCD etc etc etc.>>

Errr. . . uh. . . pretty darn close, Mish.

finance.yahoo.com

(A few other stocks were up today and probably helped the TRINQ, too. Little guys like CSCO)

Have a good weekend, y'all.

the freep



To: mishedlo who wrote (43341)3/22/2002 9:31:27 PM
From: brightness00  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
The high beta stocks are up with high volume most of the day while the big caps are down with low volume. e.g. as you pointed out both MSFT and INTC are down, but the volume is only 20.7m and 33.6m respectively, while PALM is up with 55.9m, EMLX is up with 16.1m, JNPR up with 24.8m. I'm afraid the Westpac indicator might still be valid.



To: mishedlo who wrote (43341)3/22/2002 9:33:03 PM
From: brightness00  Respond to of 99280
 
ps.
More QLGC traded today than QCOM. Who'd thunk!