To: Ilaine who wrote (22023 ) 3/23/2002 12:36:17 PM From: gamesmistress Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500 I don't blame everything on Chamberlain, he was far from alone in his beliefs (most people supported his going to Munich), but that doesn't make him any less wrong or less responsible for his actions. His appeasement mentality was obvious from the start of his accession to the Prime Ministership in May 1937, and it's also clear that he hadn't a clue about what Hitler was really up to (guess he didn't read - or believe - Mein Kampf). All through the 30's, though, Britain and France kept making concessions to Hitler - broken treaties, troop buildup and movements, etc - none of it brought any decisive action from them. Chamberlain condoned the Anschluss and it was in fact welcomed by a LOT of Austrians - don't know how many, but the idea that they were "victims" of Hitler is not exactly so. Truth is I think neither Britain nor France had the stomach for another war. France damn near bled to death in WWI and didn't have the strength or the will to fight again. If Britain had not realized the importance of air warfare and developed the RAF and radar they could not have held Germany off either. I agree, if Hitler had not opened a two front war by invading the Soviet Union before Britain was defeated (and delayed the invasion by 4 weeks to crush Yugoslavia, practically guaranteeing they could not succeed before winter), plus telling the Japanese that Germany would declare war on the US if the Japanese attacked us, the outcome might have been very different. I think the incremental approach to "getting rid of undesirables" shows Hitler's evil genius and understanding of psychology. Why should the average German care what happens to someone who is not like him, who is a troublemaker, or a drain on society? Just take care of ME. Hitler played on this attitude like a virtuoso. Of course, when reality sinks in...