Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mannie who wrote (17271)	3/23/2002 2:46:27 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 74559

Votes for GW, that is the benefit. Votes. I think you're right - but wonder if he's thinking ahead to his own re-election or just ahead to the next Congressional election. Wonder if one could tie beneficiaries of these protectionist actions to contested races, especially Senate races? Hmm. No Senate races in WA or Pa this year. In GA, Dem. Senator Cleland is vulnerable per this: Senator Max Cleland is up for re-election in 2002. He is one of the more vulnerable Democrat senators up for re-election, considering that he is often at odds with President Bush, who won the state of Georgia by nearly 12%. In addition, Cleland won election to the Senate in 1996 by a mere 1% and was unable to obtain 50% of the total vote. Georgia Republicans are eager to mount a strong challenge to Cleland in 2002. nrsc.org