Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Right Wing Extremist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Clarke who wrote (24963)	3/24/2002 8:01:53 AM
From: Tom Clarke	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 59480

What Hollings' Bill Would Do By Declan McCullagh 1:25 p.m. March 22, 2002 PST WASHINGTON -- If Hollywood and the music industry get their way, new software and hardware will sport embedded copy protection technology. A bill introduced by Senate Commerce Chairman Fritz Hollings would prohibit the sale or distribution of nearly any technology -- unless it features copy-protection standards to be set by the federal government. Here's a primer on the Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act (S.2048): Creating: Anyone selling -- or creating and distributing -- "digital media devices" may not do so unless they include government-approved security standards. Digital media devices are defined as any hardware or software that can reproduce or display copyrighted works. [Section 5(a)(1)] Importing: It would be unlawful to import software or hardware without government-approved security standards. It's not clear whether this section bans an individual downloading a copy of a program from a non-U.S. website. [Section 5(a)(1)] Protecting: Network-connected computer systems may not delete markers indicating a file is copy-protected. Such systems must preserve the markers intact. This section applies to peer-to-peer networks, FTP sites, websites, routers, Internet providers, library terminals and more. [Section 4] Removing: Knowingly removing copy-protection markers from digital content is prohibited. [Section 6(a)(1)] Sending: It would be unlawful to knowingly distribute or send someone any digital content that has been purged of its this-is-copy-protected marker. [Section 6(a)(2)] Violations of any of those four sections will be punished by civil penalties ranging from $200 to $25,000 per violation, and, in some cases, federal felony charges. Fair use: Another section says that if anyone wants to use the copy-protection standard, to be drafted by the Federal Communications Commission, they have to use the whole thing. That's designed to preserve at least minimal "fair use" rights. [Section 6(b)] But it's a section with blunt teeth. Nearly all the other parts of the bill promise criminal penalties: This merely promises civil damages of between $200 and $2,500. MP3 players: One part of the bill overrides a landmark lawsuit that said the Rio MP3 player did not violate copyright law. In 1999, a federal appeals court ruled that Diamond Multimedia Systems could sell the Rio -- a decision that ushered in the MP3 craze. This bill rewrites current copyright law to require copy-protection in any device that "retrieves or accesses copyrighted works in digital form." "By including that, they want to get around the Rio court case," says Ethan Ackerman, a senior research fellow at the University of Washington School of Law. "This is statutorily overruling that court case. This way they can sue the player manufacturers." r.hotwired.com