SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (241487)3/24/2002 4:24:49 PM
From: joseph krinsky  Respond to of 769667
 
New York Post
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1948

Ex-Mufti, Criminal Ally

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

State Dept. Conceals Promised White
Paper Book; Uses Whitewash Instead
By OBSERVER
On Mar. 19, 1942, the ex-Mufti of Jerusalem spoke to the Arab world by Rome radio and said: “If, God forbid, America and her allies are victorious in this war . . . then the world will become hell, God forbid. But Allah is too just and merciful to grant such murderous violators any victory.”

After a long struggle and supreme sacrifices, the “murderous violators” became victors. They entered Germany while the ex-Mufti was still there with the bags of gold he had received from Hitler. He escaped to Switzerland, was expelled from there back to Germany, was captured by the French army and placed under house arrest; then he escaped from France to Cairo on a false passport, and became the head of the Arab Higher Committee.

On Aug. 28, 1946, Dean Acheson, then Acting Secretary of State, announced that “the State Dept. is preparing a White Paper concerning the activities of the ex-Mufti of Jerusalem.” Acheson said the publication would be in the form of a book, which would cover all the documents concerning the ex-Mufti seized from German files.

This While Paper has not yet been published, although 17 months have passed.

What keeps the State Dept. from publishing it? Who is interested in the delay? Are all the documents safe?

* * *

In October, 1941 Gen. Wavell, commander of the British Middle Eastern forces, offered a $100,000 (25,000 pounds) reward for the capture of the ex-Mufti, dead or alive. This offer has not been withdrawn and therefore it still stands. Nevertheless, the British Government allies itself with the ex-Mufti and the Arab Higher Committee which he heads, and follows him on everything that concerns Palestine.

In August, 1945, Yugoslavia asked that the ex-Mufti be placed on the official list of war criminals. What is the reason for the failure to bring him to trial in Germany, where he was captured when Germany collapsed?

If the State Dept. is not subservient to this war criminal, why does it keep back documents it is bound to publish? Officials of the State Dept. who conceal documents that would be useful at present during the trials of war criminals are guilty of shielding the criminal and become fellow culprits.

What, can be the facts that the friends of the ex-Mufti in the State Dept. should find It necessary to add the information to the unpublished archives, instead of releasing it without delay, as I promised by Dean Acheson over 17 months ago? This protected person is a fugitive from justice, and has been since 1937, being under a still valid warrant of arrest of the Palestine government for the assassination of Jews, Arabs, and British, including Galilee Commissioner Andrews. Since then he has lost his Muftiship, to which he was never elected by the Arabs, but merely appointed, ignoramus that he is (he never finished a single course in the Cairo Theological University and was expelled) through the intrigue of Gen. Storrs, later of evil Cyprus fame.

* * *

The ex·Mufti escaped from Jerusalem and Palestine in the garb of a woman. In Syria he was on Mussolini’s payroll. When, with the beginning of the war, his position in Syria, a French mandate, became ‘insecure,’ he escaped to Iraq. There he worked hard and succeeded in bringing Iraq into the war against the Allies, the declaration of war having been made on May 2, 1941. At that time the Nazis’ entered Greece and Egypt.

When the revolt was crushed (mainly by the Jewish volunteers from Palestine), the ex-Mufti escaped to Iran and hid himself in the Japanese Embassy there. From Teheran he escaped to Italy, where his arrival was announced by the Fascist radio as a “great and happy event;” in November, 1941, he arrived in Berlin and was received by Hitler. In 1942 the ex-Mufti organized the Arab Legion that fought the American invasion in Africa (on Apr. 10, 1946, Representative Celler referred to 3,000 members of the Arab Legion that were held prisoners of war at Camp Opelika in Alabama).

* * *

On Dec. 29, 1942 the ex-Mufti sent a telegram of congratulations to Emperor Hirohito, assuring the latter that the Arabs were “praying for the final victory of Japanese arms.”

By the end of 1943 the ex-Mufti had organized Bosnian “Black Legions” to fight the Allies. He also bears a heavy responsibility for the annihilation of European Jewry, according to Nazi testimony given at Nuremberg. He visited the gas chambers; he wrote to the Cabinet Ministers of Hungary and Romania asking them to send the Jews from their countries to the concentration camps in Poland.

Thus according to the Charter of the International Tribunal at Nuremberg, the ex-Mufti is a criminal on all three counts, for crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity.

If the ex-Mufti is not only not brought to Nuremberg, but is permitted to continue his murderous career, then we will do well to reflect once more upon his words quoted at the beginning of this article. Did not the world really become hell?


varchive.org



To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (241487)3/24/2002 4:30:12 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Is it any wonder Evile is more and more disliked by SI?



To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (241487)3/24/2002 4:31:08 PM
From: joseph krinsky  Respond to of 769667
 
thetruthonly.tripod.com



To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (241487)4/6/2002 2:04:08 AM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Israel's "occupation" is a temporary police action to find, kill (a good thing in this case) and arrest terrorists and seize their caches of arms. Totally legitimate and necessary because Arafat has totally failed as a leader. He either wil not or cannot stop terrorism.

The terrorists are 100% responsible for screwing up every peace accord in recent memory including the one Bill Clinton fought so hard to put together. This accord gave the Palestinians more than they will ever get from anyone again. But what did they do? They bombed and turned it down. Didn't even offer a compromise. CLear they don't want peace and terrorists rule the masses.

Therefore, unless you're someone who likes Bin Lauden and wants to turn the world into a 7th century camel camp full of dead bodies and enslaved women, you have to support swift and strong police actions. The myth circulated within the Arab world that Israel wants to expand is "empire" is just pure BS and anyone with a brain who can read knows it. Unfortunately few supporters of terrorists can read or are educated outside their brain-washing madrasses. Also awful that the Arab press is spreading such insidious lies which only play into the hands of terrorists and make them celebrities.

I would give my life to fight against terrorists because they are pure-pure evil. They are the scourge of mankind now and you know who they hurt the most? Their own people. SO I would be doing Palestinians a favor by kiling them, as Sharon's army is now. Thank God they wasted those hamas leaders today. Who else had the balls to do it. Kill as many as possible because each one will murder hundreds if he has the chance.

By the way, I am not Jewish and have never supported israel before. In fact I used to think Israelis were the problem. Now I KNOW they are not. The evidence makes it very clear now.