SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: joseph krinsky who wrote (241662)3/25/2002 4:54:33 AM
From: joseph krinsky  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
The sheikhdom strikes back

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: March 25, 2002
1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

Saudi Arabia is getting panicky.

The oil sheikhs who run the totalitarian police state are sensitive to the way the American people are beginning to catch on to their repressive, duplicitous style.

A case in point is the way the largest Saudi newspaper, Asharqalawsat, went after American mother Pat Roush last week.

Roush's daughters, both American citizens, were kidnapped by their Saudi-born father 16 years ago and taken to the oil kingdom. Roush's attempts at seeing her daughters and getting them freed from the confines of Saudi Arabia to make their own choices have been thwarted – both in Riyadh and, for political reasons, in Washington.

In response to interest in Congress, which has scheduled hearings next month on American hostages in Saudi Arabia, the official newspaper viciously smeared Roush in a recent report.

The report contends Roush married Khalid Gheshayan in the 1970s and converted to Islam. The report claims, using unnamed family sources, that Roush had multiple abortions before the couple was married and that she "forced" Gheshayan to marry her.

"In fact, outside of a few minor details, the whole article is a lie," says Roush. "For the record I am not a Muslim, never practiced Islam and never converted to Islam. The question of Islam in this case is not an issue. Whatever religion I am (by the way I am a devout Catholic) is not what we are addressing here and now. What is important is my two daughters – their lives, their future and their freedom."

Roush rightly charges that the real issue is why American women are being held in Saudi Arabia in violation of their constitutional rights as American citizens.

Roush says Alia, now 23, has been sold to a relative in an arranged marriage and is now pregnant.

"She will be a brood mare for this man for the rest of her life," she says. "I want more for my little girls than that. I want my daughters to be free human beings – to walk as children of the light in a free country where they decide where they want to live, how they want to worship God and who they want to marry. I want my daughters to be able to love and live with freedom without a Saudi man as their prison guard."

While the Saudi newspaper claims the women want to remain in Saudi Arabia, Pat Roush just wants them to make that decision without coercion.

"Why don't you bring them to the United States and then ask them where they want to live and if they want to return to Saudi Arabia?" she said in a letter to the Saudi newspaper. "This is a free country. We allow our daughters to speak for themselves not through some man who owns them, controls them and threatens them."

One of the things that concerns the Saudis is that Pat Roush is raising the stakes at a critical juncture in U.S.-Saudi relations.

"I am fighting not only for their [her children's] freedom, but for a total change in policy between the United States and the kingdom of Saudi Arabia," she says. "No one should have to endure the pain and suffering that my daughters and I have gone through. I am fighting for freedom and justice."

It's funny, but with all the talk about "Mideast peace," there is precious little concern expressed for freedom and justice. These are values practically unknown in the Arab world.

Is it possible to achieve peace without freedom and justice?

Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Jeanne Kirkpatrick made the point eloquently in the 1980s that free republics seldom attack one another. This is the great unspoken, but highly relevant point about the Mideast conflict.

The U.S. is using military force to dismantle what President Bush calls one of the most corrupt and repressive regimes the world has ever known in Afghanistan. That regime was sponsored by Saudi Arabia. That regime was a creation of Saudi Arabia. That regime was modeled after Saudi Arabia.

Yet, because of its oil power, Saudi Arabia is treated much differently by the United States. It is considered somehow a "moderating" influence in the Mideast. It is not.

The charade is over, and Pat Roush's plight is a perfect illustration of how the U.S. has kow-towed for too long to a regime that permits no religious freedom, keeps women in bondage and holds American citizens hostage.

Let the hearings begin.

worldnetdaily.com



To: joseph krinsky who wrote (241662)3/25/2002 5:07:39 AM
From: joseph krinsky  Respond to of 769670
 
An uneasy Iraq awaits US move
Recent defectors describe a 'siege' mentality in Baghdad and demoralized, ready-to-jump troops.
By Scott Peterson | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

DOHUK, NORTHERN IRAQ - Tough American rhetoric about toppling Iraqi strongman Saddam Hussein, and the resolve shown by US forces in Afghanistan, is causing deep unease in Baghdad.

Iraq's military forces are now on the highest state of alert, and intelligence services and a host of pro-regime militias are strengthening their grip on the streets.

"Saddam is extremely worried," says a young businessman who escaped a southern Shiite Muslim business center a week ago, and – like all defectors interviewed for this story – could not be identified because of possible retribution. "Our people are like a time bomb. They need someone to switch it on, and it will blow."

Recent military and civilian defectors here in opposition-controlled northern Iraq describe a 'siege' mentality.

But they also speak of a deep demoralization within the armed forces that could lead to mass defections and a popular uprising in the face of any concerted US military action – a critical ingredient to any Pen- tagon strategy to carry out Washington's policy of "regime change" in Iraq.

After two decades of war, deprivation, and steady, bare-knuckled repression to stamp out the slightest hint of dissent, these defectors say that Iraqis are ready for a change. They are both afraid of their uncertain future while hopeful that American rhetoric turns into action.

While President Bush says that he has not yet decided how the US will expand its declared war on terrorism to Iraq, he has warned that he will "deal with" Saddam Hussein.

Vice President Dick Cheney scoured the region last week for anti-Iraq support. And Pentagon planners have already begun to reconfigure US military assets around the region, from Kuwait and Saudi Arabia to, reportedly, Bulgaria and Romania. Opposition sources say a CIA assessment team visited northern Iraq late last month, to check the capabilities of Kurdish opposition forces and survey three airports.

The US goal may have unexpected support among disgruntled Iraqi troops – as long as any US attacks focus on Hussein and his regime, and not on the Iraqi people.

"Everybody is fed up with this regime, because it has been in continuous battle since 1980," says Hamed (not his real name), an 18-year veteran tank commander, who fought during the Gulf War and defected a year ago. He has the sharp eyes of a determined, professional officer.

"If a US strike happens, nobody will resist," Hamed says. He estimates that 85 percent of military forces will surrender. Citing several examples, he also says that Iraqi quick-reaction ability has dropped 90 percent in the past decade.

"The Iraq Army has nothing to fight for," agrees Tariq (not his real name), a well-educated Iraqi military doctor who defected several months ago. "If there is a possibility that Saddam will be removed, the majority of the army will put down their weapons."

Hussein's military
Republican Guard units that gamely resisted US attacks during the Gulf War are weaker today, Tariq says, and plagued by defections. Even the hand-picked Special Republican Guard (SRG) – the best equipped and paid, created after the 1991 uprisings with the sole purpose of defending Baghdad – is not immune. "A lot of people are waiting for a US strike, not because they like the US, but because they hate Saddam," Tariq adds, stroking the dark stubble that frames his face.

No matter how deep that sentiment, turning it into a victorious sweep that washes Hussein from power in Baghdad won't be easy.

"It is true that the strength of the Iraqi Army is half what it was in 1991, that they have gone leaner ... and have had to cannibalize their equipment to get by," says Judith Yaphe, a former intelligence analyst now at the National Defense University in Washington. "But that does not mean that they are not a formidable fighting force. They still have a core of well-trained soldiers and are more than a match for any opposition inside the country – and most of their neighbors as well.

"We can't say that they are all going to put down their weapons at the first smart bomb," Ms. Yaphe says. "The question is one of [US] credibility: What will it take to convince these people that this is a serious effort? We can't afford to do what we did in the past, and pull back or leave."

The Bush administration is not likely to make that mistake, Yaphe adds, "but I am not sure they understand what it will take to achieve that end."

Defectors say Baghdad is getting ready. Iraqis are hoarding food and fuel, being given three months of food rations in a single week, and those trying to leave main cities are being turned back. Ruling Baath Party officials have been issued military gear, and Army units are reportedly being issued with large supplies of ammunition.

"Saddam is creating a new militia every day – there are so many that we lost count," says the Iraqi businessman. Several of his relatives were executed after the 1991 uprising. His father was tortured to death in 1997 for allegedly betraying the regime. Because of that, he had to report to local intelligence authorities every 10 days. "Every time you pass one checkpoint, you get another one. Now they are on 24-hour red alert – you just can't live there anymore."

This businessman hid in one room for 11 days in before he left, he says, to avoid being forced to sign up for one of the latest militias called Al-Qods, which means "Jerusalem."

"There are hundreds of families, with only women left," says a relative who also escaped, his serious eyes crowned by thick brows.

The number of defectors who have made it to Kurdish Democratic Party-controlled territory – turned into a safe haven after the Gulf War – has jumped by one-third in the past two months. Until January, there were 62 here – many for five or six years. Today there are 92.

"The Iraqi Army is tired, and they are not prepared to be killed for something they don't believe in," says Lt. Col. Wagih Barzani, commander of the KDP's 1st Army Special Forces. Other groups such as the SRG "will fight to save their own skins – not for Saddam, but because their own fate is linked to him."

Ready to jump ship
Defectors and Kurdish opposition leaders here agree that there are legions of Hussein's footsoldiers waiting for an excuse to turn against the regime, as entire units did in 1991, in the aftermath of Iraq's defeat in the Gulf War. That uprising threatened Baghdad, as Kurdish militias advanced from the north, and Shiite guerrillas from the south.

Buoyed by a promise of assistance from the first President Bush, tens of thousands of Iraqis took up the fight. But Hussein counterattacked, brutally re-establishing control. US forces did not intervene.

This time, options include the "Afghan model," in which US special forces would work closely with proxy militia forces on the ground – in this case the two main armed Kurdish factions in northern Iraq and Shiite guerrillas in the south. Their advance would be made possible by a heavy, targeted air campaign. Another option is an all-out, go-it-alone US invasion involving tens of thousands of troops.

Full HTML version of this story which may include photos, graphics, and related links

csmonitor.com



To: joseph krinsky who wrote (241662)3/25/2002 4:46:04 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769670
 
Joseph,

You post sounds a little crazy. How many millions of innocents in the 'Stans will we have to kill in order to feel that we've revenged the 3,000 or so innocents who were murdered in the 911 incident. How many? And do you ever stop to consider the "blowback" that you out-of-control vengeance would wreak upon yet more innocents here in the U.S.A.

Your solution is ludicrous and the results bound to be unsatisfactory over time. Breaking the cycle of vengeance is a far wiser course than either you or the Resident seem to be able to figure out.

-Ray