Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Strictly: Drilling II -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Louis V. Lambrecht who wrote (9908)	3/25/2002 8:12:11 AM
From: bob3nc	Respond to of 36161

Louis..Happy Birthday!!

To: Louis V. Lambrecht who wrote (9908)	3/25/2002 8:44:43 AM
From: re3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36161

usnews.com if someone could explain, the CDIC in Canada only guarantees 60k canadian in each of the big banks per depositer (although to my understanding this is 60k in a non retirement fund and you can have 60k in a separate retirement fund too)... is this so much different than Japan ?

To: Louis V. Lambrecht who wrote (9908)	3/25/2002 2:22:26 PM
From: t4texas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 36161

i don't understand your reply. it does seem to matter who is big in steel in europe. your very own link shows quite a lot of european steel companies who are big. it also appears the european steel companies are either subsidized or partially owned by the governments there. the reason for all the squeaking coming out of europe appears to be the bigness of the steel industry there (large labor pool thus vote, and the famous european strikes, and i suppose larger subsidies from european tax payers if the steel heads for the usa). no need to explain the dumping idea. i understood that. that was the justification by the bush admin for the tariff. i am assuming (perhaps wrongly) that the tariffs for korean, japanese, or chinese steel would be much higher than any tariff for european steel.