SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (4743)3/25/2002 3:43:24 PM
From: Poet  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21057
 
ROFLMAO!!!

Um, have you read the RWET recently? It's a continuous (not to mention short) loop of anti-Choice rhetoric and Clinton-bashing. I'm surprised they haven't all fallen into a deep sleep from self hypnosis.



To: Bill who wrote (4743)3/25/2002 3:54:06 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Respond to of 21057
 
Dang, I think I set off another war here! And I wasn't even trying!

Must be talent.

Now Karen's going to get on my case. :-)



To: Bill who wrote (4743)3/25/2002 5:44:41 PM
From: E  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
Yes, RWers do it all the time. They are not afraid to talk issues and debate all comers.

Oh, please. The RWers appear to me often enough to like to debate until they see themselves losing. Then they 1) PM poor Neocon to come help them, 2) Pile on, then accuse their opponent of writing too many posts in replying to their numerous posts, 3) Ban, silencing their opponent, and continuing their "debate" safely undebated, tossing off insults to the excluded in a comforting, private circle jerk.

I like debating Neocon. I like debating the whole cohort. I do find the tactic of attempting to silence the debate by accusing, oh, say, "her," the single one on a side, of posting more than any one of the multitudinous others annoying, as annoying as I do protected references to the excluded and absurd self-congratulation for non-existent qualities.

Harrumph.