SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ptanner who wrote (75536)3/25/2002 5:43:24 PM
From: fyodor_Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872
 
PT: This was the one I thought was a step back from Nvidea's best (ie. about GeForce4 MX) but I have limited knowledge/interest beyond high quality 2D video.

I did say "almost as good as" ;-)
And further qualified it with a "if SiS have decent drivers" ;-))

Even though the SiS chip does have hardware T&L, the drivers still benefit from good SIMD optimizing. I have no idea if SiS' drivers have SSE and/or 3DNow! optimizations to any noteworthy degree.

There's also the significant issue of bandwidth efficiency. NVIDIA have done a lot of work with their GF4 model to ensure that the memory bandwidth is used as efficiently as possible (e.g. by splitting the 128bit wide interface into 4 32bit memory controllers). Differences in cache models can also seriously impact the available bandwidth.

-fyo



To: ptanner who wrote (75536)3/25/2002 7:26:14 PM
From: dale_laroyRespond to of 275872
 
>This was the one I thought was a step back from Nvidea's best (ie. about GeForce4 MX) but I have limited knowledge/interest beyond high quality 2D video.<

According to the limited information available, it is about 8% faster than GeForce4 MX 440, which would make it very close to the performance of GeForce4 MX 460.