SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (4817)3/25/2002 7:09:56 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 21057
 
Tests show no screening improvements
post-Sept. 11

By Blake Morrison
USA TODAY

In the months after Sept. 11, airport screeners confiscated record numbers
of nail clippers and scissors. But nearly half the time, they failed to stop
the guns, knives or simulated explosives carried past checkpoints by
undercover investigators with the Transportation Department's inspector
general.

In fact, even as the Federal Aviation Administration evacuated terminals
and pulled passengers from more than 600 planes because of security
breaches, a confidential memo obtained by USA TODAY shows
investigators noticed no discernable improvements by screeners in the
period from November through early February, when the tests were
conducted.

At screening checkpoints, the memo reads, ''only the opaque object (such
as a film bag) were routinely caught.'' Guns passed through in 30% of
tests, knives went unnoticed 70% of the time, and screeners failed to
detect simulated explosives in 60% of tests.

Perhaps just as troubling, investigators ''were successful in boarding 58
aircraft'' at 17 of the 32 airports tested. ''In 158 tests,'' the memo says, ''we
got access to either the aircraft (58) or the tarmac (18) 48 percent of our
tries.''

The Feb. 19 memo, sent from the inspector general's office to top
transportation officials, including Transportation Secretary Norman
Mineta, illustrates that major security problems remained in the months
after Sept. 11.

Indeed, security might even have gotten worse after the terrorist attacks.
Failure rates in the memo are higher than those in FAA tests cited during
congressional testimony last year. For example, according to the General
Accounting Office, ''in 1987, screeners missed 20%'' of weapons in FAA
tests. Because knives were banned after Sept. 11, investigators hadn't
included them in previous tests.

Days after the inspector general's tests ended, the new Transportation
Security Administration took control of airport security from the FAA. But
screeners remain employed by private security companies, overseen by
TSA officials.

''We still have the same people doing the same jobs they did before Sept.
11,'' says Reynold Hoover, an expert on counterterrorism who conducts
screening seminars.

Hoover cautions that screeners are only part of the problem. Tests of
aircraft security and access were equally unsettling, he says.

''The ability to access aircraft in what is supposed to be the most secure
area of the airport, that is pretty frightening,'' Hoover says. ''The fact that
they're able to get in shows that there's still a weakness in the control
measures.''

FAA spokeswoman Laura Brown says security agents ''took aggressive
enforcement action'' during the test period. Among the actions: evacuating
40 terminals and deplaning 636 flights between Oct. 30-Feb. 16.

''Before Sept. 11, the FAA recognized significant improvements were
needed in screener training, and we developed regulations to require
better training and to give us more direct control over screening
companies,'' Brown says.

Other current and former FAA officials say the agency often ignored
results of its own testing, failed to take corrective action, and after Sept.
11, did not dispatch its elite undercover team to test security.

A senior TSA spokesman says the new agency plans an aggressive
approach to security -- both in training screeners and imbuing a new
philosophy of vigilance.

''We have significantly enhanced what people are looking for and what
procedures they go through to look for things,'' the spokesman says.
''Secondly, the training has been readjusted to meet the requirements and
needs post-Sept. 11.''

In the next four weeks, 1,200 new supervisory screeners begin a 45-hour
training program, then report to airports for two weeks of on-the-job
training. ''These are fresh people,'' the spokesman says.

Whether the new approach or new workers will make airports safer
quickly remains unclear.

Hoover calls the TSA's screener training program ''an ambitious plan,'' but
he says he expects dramatic improvements by November, when screeners
become federal workers.

''Hopefully, you're going to be able to raise their skill level,'' he says.

usatoday.com