Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cosmicforce who wrote (4860)	3/26/2002 8:22:43 AM
From: Bill	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 21057

The longer this Enron probe goes on, the less I think anyone from Enron broke any laws.

To: cosmicforce who wrote (4860)	3/26/2002 12:47:49 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 21057

Its not that I don't want to know. Its that evidence you have put forward so far is extremely weak. I want to know which people were there and what deal they sprang. We don't get to know... What evidence do you have that any deal was sprung. Your "smoking gun drawer" seems to be that Enron officials talked to Cheney, that details of the meeting where not made public, and that awhile later Enron went bankrupt. I wonder what going bankrupt has to do with anything. If government officals talking to business execs without releasing the details of the meeting is wrong in your opinion then why focus on Enron? What about all the other meetings that government officals have had in this and in previous administrations? If you want to argue that the government is being too secretive in this case I might even agree with you, but you have presented nothing that even hints at any involvement of the current administration in the Enron scandal. Was everyone else Enron execs have talked to over the last several years also "involved in the Enron scandal"? Tim