Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Paint The Table -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (21918)	3/26/2002 2:10:09 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23786

geeeezus keeerist Gloop, were you drinking tonight? Do you really think that I am looking for other guru's opinions to make decisions on? I started that poll as a start to compiling sentiment on SI. I included my interpretation of other people's opinions ust to round out the overall sentiment. Now go climb back under your rock with that Bernt Farver dood.

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (21918)	3/26/2002 7:54:09 AM
From: AugustWest	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 23786

This was posted by trippet on the CFZ ewave thread. some good discussion/speculation about ensued about it The US Federal Reserve in January considered a variety of "unconventional" emergency measures to be taken if cutting short-term interest rates failed to arrest a US recession and prevent Japanese-style deflation. One of those steps may have been a plan to buy US stocks. According to minutes of its January 25-26 meeting, the Fed's policy-making Open Market Committee agreed "unconventional policy measures might be available" to deal with a situation in which "the economy were to deteriorate substantially in a period when nominal short-term interest rates were already at very low levels", although, it said, the efficacy of such measures was "uncertain". The minutes vaguely mention internal analyses of such a scenario news.ft.com

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (21918)	3/26/2002 8:48:57 AM
From: Carolyn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23786

Fig, nice post. It does indeed look bad - many overvalued sectors. However, am I the only one who has noticed (or thinks she has noticed) that the time separating under and over has narrowed? We seem to be an impatient lot.

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (21918)	3/26/2002 9:14:48 AM
From: mph	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23786

<<We haven't seen much bashing on this board which tells me we are a high class of debris <g>!>> that high class description is right on, but speak for yourself on the debris front<g>

To: Augustus Gloop who wrote (21918)	3/26/2002 9:28:11 AM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23786

I look at the COMP daily linear bar chart and I see what looks to me like a sine wave that is degrading into a flat line. To me, that suggests we are at a support/resistance level that can be difficult if not impossible to interpret successfully. I can be "right" and lose money, and I can be "wrong" and make money. My goal is to exit every trade with a profit. I think we will bounce off 1786. After that, if it happens, I'll be able to better predict a subsequent move. If it doesn't happen, that will tell me most of what I need to know anyway.