SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : The ENRON Scandal -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Raymond Duray who wrote (3693)3/26/2002 3:49:00 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 5185
 
I.R.S. Says Offshore Tax Evasion Is Widespread

The New York Times


March 26, 2002

By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON

The I.R.S. said yesterday that
Americans in far greater numbers
than it had once thought were evading
taxes by secretly depositing money in
tax havens like the Cayman Islands
and withdrawing it using American
Express , MasterCard
and Visa cards.

The I.R.S. said its estimate that one
million to two million Americans might
be using such accounts was based on records that it had obtained by summons
from MasterCard of 230,000 bank accounts in three tax-haven countries.


A prominent criminal tax lawyer, Elliott H. Kajan of Beverly Hills, Calif., said,
however, that the estimate was so out of proportion that he doubted it would hold
up.

But the Internal Revenue Service said that from records of purchases, it had
already identified hundreds of income tax cheats, including executives of publicly
traded companies, business owners, doctors, lawyers and investment professionals.

These people - most believed to have incomes that would put them among the top
1 percent of taxpayers - "are using offshore cards to pay for living expenses," the
I.R.S. said, from groceries to cars to college tuition for their children.

Offshore accounts would be of little use to people whose wages are reported to the
I.R.S. by their employers. But entertainers, business owners, investors and others
who control what is reported to the I.R.S. can use offshore accounts to hide fees,
profits, dividends, interest and capital gains.

Setting up such accounts has become a popular practice among a number of
financial institutions that provide services to affluent individuals. Joseph C. West,
the revenue agent running the investigation, said in an affidavit that he had found
dozens of companies using the Internet to solicit people who want to hide money.
Among companies the I.R.S. identified in court papers as advertising offshore
banking secrecy were KPMG, the big accounting firm, and three big banking
companies - Barclays, HSBC and Royal Bank of Canada (news/quote).

Officials at KPMG and HSBC did not return calls last night. Representatives of
Barclays and the Royal Bank said they could not locate someone knowledgeable on
the issue.

A senior I.R.S. official said many of those with the offshore
accounts may have been seeking to hide income and
assets from a spouse, especially in divorce, or from
creditors, including plaintiffs in lawsuits. Tax evasion, she
said, was an unavoidable byproduct of these strategies.

The commissioner of internal revenue, Charles O.
Rossotti, said the I.R.S. was determined to be more
aggressive going after Americans who use such accounts
to avoid taxes.

"For years people assumed we wouldn't be able to find
them," Mr. Rossotti said. "Simply put, the guarantee of
secrecy associated with offshore banking is evaporating."

In October 2000, the I.R.S. sought credit card records of
accounts of MasterCard and American Express in
Caribbean tax havens that routinely showed charges in
the United States. At the time, prominent tax experts said
they assumed that at most tens of thousands of Americans
had such accounts.

The I.R.S. made its estimate based on the market share of
MasterCard, which is much smaller than Visa in the
international credit card business, and the estimated
volume of business done in three dozen tax-haven
countries.


Several lawyers said yesterday that they were astounded
by the new I.R.S. estimate of the extent of the conduct,
which was included in papers filed in federal court in San
Francisco.

Katherine Kneally, a criminal tax lawyer in New York who
heads an American Bar Association committee on tax
penalties, said the estimate of such widespread cheating sent a dark message
about the income tax system, which depends on individuals' voluntarily
determining how much they owe and filing honest tax returns.

"It says that the I.R.S. has drifted from its mission," Ms. Kneally said. "It says that
the message of deterrence is not out there."

The I.R.S. audits only about one in 160 income tax returns. It devotes few
resources to identifying those who do not file tax returns: of several dozen
individuals and businesses named in The New York Times in recent years as not
filing tax returns, only two said that they had been audited.

Many of the offshore account holders identified by the I.R.S. did not file income tax
returns, the agency said, while others filed, but failed to report their offshore
account.

It is legal to have an offshore account, provided it is reported and any taxes are
paid. Failure to disclose such holdings is a felony punishable by up to five years in
prison.

In 1999, the I.R.S. said, 117,000 Americans checked the box on their income tax
return disclosing an offshore account, far fewer than the number of MasterCard
accounts the agency found in just Antigua and Barbuda, the Bahamas, and the
Cayman Islands.

Because of secrecy laws in the tax-haven nations, the charge records reveal only
account numbers - not names. So investigators, in a laborious process, must turn
to merchants to obtain the names of the individuals through their credit card
receipts.

Investigators will have an easier time finding tax evasion by customers of American
Express, which agreed to turn over some records after giving the customers
warning. But the agreement is limited to those accounts, billed to addresses in the
three tax havens, that incurred at least five charges in the United States in 1998
and 1999 and in which at least one was for at least $2,500 on certain types of
purchases, including automobiles, jewelry and yachts.

Unlike MasterCard and Visa, which as networks do not know the names of
customers, American Express knows its cardholders.

A senior I.R.S. official acknowledged yesterday that the agency lacked the
resources to prosecute most of the offshore tax evaders or even to pursue civil
penalties against more than a fraction.

"We have lots of indications of tax evasion here," said Dale Hart, an I.R.S. deputy
commissioner, "and we are going to be using the resources we do have to work
those cases to the best of our ability."

But, she noted, "every day, several times a day, we make decisions about which
cases we will work and which we will not."

Congress has sharply reduced the agency's budget for tax enforcement. Today, just
23 tax auditors remain on the payroll in Manhattan, the richest tax district in the
country, down from 150 several years ago.

When the I.R.S. obtained records of one bank in the Cayman Islands, it said it
found 1,500 cases worth prosecuting. "How many have they brought?" asked Larry
Campagna, a criminal tax lawyer in Houston. "Maybe 10?"

Mr. Campagna said that when the investigation was completed many of the credit
cards would be found to have innocent explanations and not involve tax crimes. Ms.
Kneally and Mr. Kagan expressed similar views.

But Ms. Hart said she was confident from the data analyzed so far that the I.R.S.
had found many deliberate tax evaders and not innocents caught up in a fishing
expedition.

The I.R.S. disclosed its estimates in seeking records of Visa cards issued in 33
nations that have been used in the United States. "If the MasterCard information is
representative of the industry," it said, "there could be one to two million U.S.
citizens with debit-credit cards issued by offshore banks."

nytimes.com



To: Raymond Duray who wrote (3693)3/26/2002 3:50:30 PM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5185
 
Paul H. O'Neil refused to investigate offshore Tax Havens last summer because of pressures
from the Banking Lobby.
It took 9/11 b4 the Bush administration would look into the matter.
And as far as we know, the FBI looks for terrorist accounts only.