Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lee Lichterman III who wrote (82887)	3/27/2002 9:24:31 AM
From: marginmike	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99985

Lee if you dont like LG ignore him. LG does great work, and has made me much $$$ in his day. He called the turn on Qcom almost to the day. When somebody regularly makes public calls they are going to be wrong. In my experience LG has been better then most. As for your employment situation, if you were such a good trader you would be able to build a fund to make $$$. As for your lame excuses for your portfolio, they are just lame. I am sorry to hear about your friends mothers death, however ignoring your portfolio when you are doling out ADVISE is pretty pathetic. I have three friends who died in WTC as do many traders, we would close out all positions or continue full speed.

To: Lee Lichterman III who wrote (82887)	3/27/2002 9:50:28 AM
From: HairBall	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 99985

Lee: I don’t follow Sew’s calls. Sew use to call me every trading day for about four to six months to discuss what the market was doing and ask my opinion on his option trades back in 1999, albeit after the fact on the option trades. So there was really little to discuss regarding the options. Since Sew has remained a gentleman since our split (at least publicly) I shall continue to do so as well. I made this post on SI... Message 17177126 ...per my work I was expecting the then "in play" rising wedge to resolve to the norm during expiry week, and it did. As far as stealing someone else’s read on the current "in play" falling wedge for the Naz Comp, you’re ignorance is once again showing. How could anyone be calling a wedge two or three weeks ago when the pivot high only took place on 3/11 only 11 trading days (that’s about two weeks) prior to your post yesterday accusing me of stealing yours and someone else’s read two weeks ago. Not to mention that the second pivot high that formed the second anchor point for the resistance line occurred on 3/19 only five trading days prior to your post yesterday. And, the second pivot low that formed the second anchor point for the support line occurred on 3/21 only three trading days prior to your post yesterday accusing me of stealing the wedge from you two weeks ago. While a downtrend or pullback was obvious, the wedge was not yet in place until 3/21. I may suspect a bullish consolidation is forming based on my intraday models, but I always wait until one does. So you see, I could not have possibly stolen an idea from you weeks ago, as the price action had yet to occur and the wedge did not yet exist. As I said Lee, with every post you make, you prove your ignorance. And only a fool would group all Texans into a single category. LG PS: Anyone that would take the time to surf through our confrontations on SI will quickly realize that you always start these confrontations between us. I can only deduce you harbor a grudge towards me. You’re just too insignificant for me to carry a grudge towards you, for the most part I find you a total waste of time.