Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (5049)	3/27/2002 12:04:30 PM
From: thames_sider	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 21057

1) did Clinton design energy policy after secret meetings with large donors who just happen to run oil/energy companies? 2) if he did, would it have been right? OR if he didn't, why bring him up? 3) Can you answer the case or are you going to revert to tedious and irrelevant slurs again? 4) can you guess why I'm becoming so bored by the bribe-taking greedos in the WH and the triumphalist cretins who worship them...? Jeez. Turkeys probably have more sense. They don't even vote to get stuffed. You not only vote to be ripped off for private gain, you cheer about it when it happens - and shout 'Clinton!' as though it's the answer to all your fatuousities... Bye, moron. Good luck with that quiz. <edit> best get help from your coterie.

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (5049)	3/27/2002 12:17:06 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

Thames wrote, quite testily I must acknowledge: 1) did Clinton design energy policy after secret meetings with large donors who just happen to run oil/energy companies? 2) if he did, would it have been right? OR if he didn't, why bring him up? Sounds like good questions to me! Sounds to me like you guys have to bring him up over and over again obsessively to change the subject from the present! So one guy on SI brings up Nixon, and 78,922 parafascist wannabes bring up Clinton, and that's even. Haha. Why were you guys obsessing on Clinton before the single Nixon reference? I know why, I know why, haha. Clinton sucks. You think that justifies everything since, and I think that's funny of you. Haha again. (I know it's marketing, the Women of Enron thing! But it's funny marketing, which is why I posted it. It made me laugh out loud in incredulity, and yet, in complete understanding and belief.)