Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (5075)	3/27/2002 2:21:59 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

I agree with everything you said he did, though "nothing but" is an oversimplification. And the notion that all politicians don't "trick people into voting for [them] through organized dishonesty" is cute, quaint, and naive in the extreme. Do the letters "PR" ring a bell? How about the phrase "focus group"? How about the word "spin"? How about "image"? We could theorize about how Carter lost, but why do that? Give me a break. (Do you really not know that I am fully aware Clinton raped Juanita Broaderick?) What has your post to do with what I wrote? Nothing. You guys are obsessed! And its utility for changing the subject gives you reason to remain obsessed! and you are nervous because it won't work forever!! It is funny, your obsession, so extreme is it. It's funny that you guys keep posting to me about Clinton as though you didn't know what I think of him. Enjoy Clinton while you can, the days of his efficacy for you are numbered.