SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (5124)3/27/2002 5:57:06 PM
From: marcos  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
Thing is, those rules allow only for long dragged out legislation through WTO and NAFTA channels, which canadians will win of course, as have we always, but during which the yeller pine landowners achieve much damage to british columbians and US homebuyers at no cost to themselves ... there is no comeback, no rules to cover the paying of costs for bringing frivolous suits ..... once that lobby has turned a US federal department into the current Commerzwaffe, consumers and efficient producers get screwed and screwed hard, no matter what

... wish there was time to type more on this, but there isn't ..... cheers



To: Neocon who wrote (5124)3/27/2002 6:17:23 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
I am instinctively against tariffs.
Sounds good to me. Now convince marcos.

However, people will use what they have to defend themselves, especially if they feel that they are suffering from unfair competition.
From The Devil's Dictionary (Ambrose Bierce):
Unfair Competition: competition


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News