Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Lucent Technologies (LU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GVTucker who wrote (19677)	3/27/2002 5:41:49 PM
From: elmatador	Respond to of 21876

Hi GV! Thanks for your reply. I was just thinking that they, both, are going to be 'Marconized'. Message 17250669

To: GVTucker who wrote (19677)	3/27/2002 8:26:04 PM
From: sylvester80	Respond to of 21876

I don't think that LU is going to go under, period. But I do think that you've got to consider a real risk of bankruptcy in looking at the common. IMO, the reward outweighs any risk by a huge margin. I mean really huge margin....

To: GVTucker who wrote (19677)	3/27/2002 8:51:02 PM
From: sylvester80	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21876

If you think that they both will die this summer, then to me that is just as much (if not more) hyperbole as sylvester was engaging in when he said that telecom would disappear if LU went to $0. Come on! For your risk of bankruptcy and the going to $0 of Paul A, it would take a catastrophic telecom disappearing act for it to happen. And I think you understand that now as I see you changed your stance quite dramatically from "risk of bankruptcy" to "I don't think that LU is going to go under, period". Which proves my point and I applaud you for being gentleman enough to admit it. If only Paul A was that honest with himself....