Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (143614)	3/27/2002 8:13:21 PM
From: SilentZ	Respond to of 1584048

>To me the UN is synonymous with the US and England but I won't argue the point. Because it should have been all finished at one time. You have a portion that's Israel, a portion that's Jordan and a portion that's no man's land. I sure there were reasons but I think those reasons should have been resolved sixty years ago. Ummm.. actually it was a part Israel and a part Jordan. There wasn't a no-man's land. The West Bank was taken by Israel in 1967 because Jordan and Iraq had attacked Israel from it. It's no-man's land now because Israel really doesn't want much of it but they don't have much of a choice but to keep it. >>The Israelis have shown great, great restraint thus far. My feeling is, that if it's "Us or Them", I'd rather Them get killed than Us. >Do you really think the Israelis have a choice? If the rest of the world would allow it to legitimately defend itself, it would. -Z