SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Donkey's Inn -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mephisto who wrote (3452)3/28/2002 5:46:43 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 15516
 
Anthrax attacker worked in U.S. lab
By Jerry Seper
THE WASHINGTON TIMES


The FBI's search for the person who mailed anthrax-laced letters that killed five persons has focused on a former U.S. scientist who worked at a government laboratory where he learned how to make a weapons-grade strain of the deadly bacteria.
Law enforcement authorities and leading biochemical experts familiar with the FBI's five-month investigation said agents targeted the unidentified scientist after extensive interviews with more than 300 persons associated with the government's anthrax program, although no charges have yet been filed.
The scientist was identified from a pool of about 50 researchers known to have the technical ability to produce the sophisticated weapons-grade anthrax strain found in the letters sent to Florida, New York, Connecticut and Washington, D.C., the sources said.
The FBI has known for more than three months that the person responsible for sending the letters was a U.S. citizen and, according to the sources, probably a former scientist connected to the government's biodefense program.
The government's chief suspect, the sources said, is believed to have worked at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases at Fort Detrick, Md., which has maintained stores of weapons-grade anthrax — commonly known as the Ames strain of Bacillus anthracis.
The sources said the former scientist is now employed as a contractor in the Washington area.
The unidentified scientist, according to the sources, was twice fired from government jobs and, after the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon that killed more than 3,000 people, reportedly made a threat to use anthrax.
He has been interviewed by FBI agents on several occasions, according to the sources, and his house has been searched.
The sources said that while numerous chemicals were located inside the house, no anthrax was found.
The FBI investigation, according to the sources, began to focus on current and former U.S. scientists after the anthrax found in letters sent to the Capitol Hill offices of Democratic Sens. Tom Daschle of South Dakota and Patrick J. Leahy of Vermont matched a finely powdered strain of the bacteria held at Fort Detrick.
Barbara Hatch Rosenberg, a microbiologist at State University of New York who heads the biological arms-control panel for the Federation of American Scientists (FAS), said that the FBI has been working on a "short list of suspects" for some time, and that agents had narrowed the list to "a particular person ... a member of the biochemical community."
"It has taken a long time for the FBI to identify any suspects in this case, and I don't know why, considering that the person responsible for this comes from a very narrow list of people who have the necessary skill to do what was done," she said. "But there is a common suspect, and the FBI has questioned that person more than once."
Mrs. Rosenberg said she and several colleagues have wondered whether the FBI's failure to bring charges in the case is related to government reluctance to publicly acknowledge its biochemical operation.
"Is the FBI dragging its feet? I just don't know. And, if so, I don't know why," she said.
The FBI has consistently maintained that the anthrax investigation is on track, and that thousands of leads have been pursued by a task force of investigators under the direction of FBI Assistant Director Van Harp, who heads the bureau's D.C. field office, and Chief Postal Inspector Kenneth C. Weaver.
Neither the FBI nor the U.S. Postal Service has identified any potential suspects.
In a letter last month to the 40,000 members of the American Society for Microbiology, Mr. Harp said it was "very likely that one or more of you know this individual."
"A review of the information to date in this matter leads investigators to believe that a single person is most likely responsible for these mailings," he said. "This person is experienced working in a laboratory. Based on his or her selection of the Ames strain of Bacillus anthracis, one would expect this individual has or had legitimate access to select biological agents at some time."
In the letter, Mr. Harp also said the suspect had the technical knowledge and expertise to produce a "highly refined and deadly product," and that he or she may have "used off-hours in a laboratory or may have even established an improvised or concealed facility comprised of sufficient equipment to produce the anthrax."
The anthrax found by investigators in the Daschle and Leahy letters was described as "weaponized," meaning it consisted of fine particles treated to eliminate static charge — preventing them from clumping and allowing them to float in the air.
According to the sources, an extraordinary concentration of spores was identified in the anthrax tested in the letters and that the purity of the bacteria was characteristic of that made at U.S. laboratories. They said the tested anthrax was unmilled, also characteristic of anthrax manufactured at U.S. laboratories.
A sampling of anthrax from the Daschle letter, they said, contained a form of silica used at U.S. laboratories. The sample did not contain bentonite, which is used by foreign laboratories, including Iraq, they said.
The government has offered a $2.5 million reward for information leading to the arrest and conviction of those responsible for sending the letters.
The five persons who died were Florida photography editor Robert Stevens, 63; U.S. postal workers Thomas Lee Morris, 55, and Joseph P. Curseen, 47, both of whom worked at the Brentwood facility in Northeast; Kathy Nyugen, a 61-year-old female hospital stockroom employee in New York; and Ottilie W. Lundgren, a 94-year-old woman from Connecticut.
All the deaths were traced to the Ames strain of the bacteria, first isolated in Iowa and maintained by the U.S. Army since 1980 for testing purposes.



To: Mephisto who wrote (3452)3/28/2002 10:17:18 PM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15516
 
One side fits all
Louisville Courier Journal
March 27, 2002

PRESIDENT Bush recently defended meetings between his administration's
energy task force and energy companies. "If you're developing an energy
plan, one place to start is to listen to people who know something about the
business," he said. "We also listened to environmental groups."

Well, not exactly.

The first release of documents and e-mail messages related to the task force
headed by Vice President Dick Cheney -- including 11,000 pages from the
Energy Department -- indicate that the gathering of facts and the weighing of
perspectives were astonishingly one-sided.


In the most deplorable example, <b<Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham met
with 36 representatives of business interests between Feb. 14 and April 26 of
last year, but held not a single session with environmental or consumer
groups.

That explains a lot -- both why the Bush energy plan turned out the way it
did, and why the administration is so resistant to releasing full records of its
study.

The administration's energy proposals, which were issued last May, focused
almost entirely on increasing production of fossil fuels and virtually ignored
conservation. The plan proposed relaxing regulations and granting subsidies
for the coal and nuclear industries, drilling for oil and gas in the Arctic
National Wildlife Refuge and building between 1,300 and 1,900 power plants
during the next 20 years.


The House passed a bill in August that incorporated most of these ideas. The
Senate is to take up its own version, which is weighted more toward
conservation, after the Easter recess. It is imperative that the Senate adopt a
more balanced approach that protects environmental and consumer
interests.

The records made public Monday, under order of two federal judges, were
heavily edited (in fact, some were blank), and the Energy Department is still
withholding 2,600 documents totaling 15,000 pages. It's fair to surmise that
the most embarrassing records are still under wraps -- among them those
dealing with meetings between Mr. Cheney and Enron CEO Kenneth Lay.


Sunshine is looked upon with disfavor by administration officials, perhaps
because it suggests to them only an unprofitable, non-fossil energy source.
But Congress and public interest groups should press the fight for release of
all the energy task forces records until the full story is brought to light.

courier-journal.com