SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: marginmike who wrote (157498)3/28/2002 9:10:54 AM
From: Horgad  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 436258
 
Greenspan not pumping fast enough?

....urging Greenspan to "get off the brakes," with regard to the nation's money supply.

cnsnews.com\Business\archive\200203\BUS20020327a.html



To: marginmike who wrote (157498)3/28/2002 9:27:22 AM
From: SouthFloridaGuy  Respond to of 436258
 
Don't you love how the media spins the worse than expected weekly jobless claims? For what it's worth, I have been trying to switch jobs and while I got some responses earlier in the year, I am getting none now and for that matter the number of actual new job postings has completely dried up in the last few weeks. I get maybe 1-2 new job postings sent to me from the NY Times - under search filed "Marketing" - every week. That's pathetic.

8:40AM: Jobless claims rose 15K to 394K; this was well above Briefing.com's 375K estimate, and the consensus estimate of 373K, but will not change anyone's labor market view given that any one week's claims surprise is not enough to form a trend, particularly after the recent long stretch of stability in the claims trend....



To: marginmike who wrote (157498)4/9/2002 12:34:16 AM
From: Agamemnon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
yeah but it's easy to give that kind of interview after everyone's mad as hell after the bust. I like Cypress's T.Rodgers who paid more in litigation rather than settling out of court w/ shysters; but would he say "buy us? we're over valued!"?