Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (49086)	3/28/2002 10:42:24 AM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 65232

"disregarding sexual restraints". Wahoo!!! The everhopeful, ever liberal rat

To: Sully- who wrote (49086)	3/28/2002 10:55:19 AM
From: Clappy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

See Clinton Clinton was only trying to screw a few interns. Bush seems bent on trying to screw the entire world... <g><ng> <rimshot> -JohnnyJackass

To: Sully- who wrote (49086)	3/28/2002 11:16:46 AM
From: BirdDog	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 65232

LICENTIOUS Actually they are marked by utter disregard for anything that is. They must change...anything. They don't bother to find out the wisdom behind why anything is the way it is. They just must change. Must change the ship...even if their change sinks the ship...the old way was bad...had to be. LOOSE They go so far in their hypocritical idealism in changing definitions. Even a hunting dog....they hate them because of the word "hunt". They ignore what they are. They change the definition of them to what is actually the definition of a Terrier...."Seek and Destroy". Then they cling to Terriers saying they are loving friends while condemning the dog who was never bred or trained to seek and destroy anything. Absolute hypocracy... Any discussion of laws etc always results in the liberals throwing out cliche's, punns, and any other liberal childish comment demanding change which results in nothing constructive. BirdDog@Prairie.com

To: Sully- who wrote (49086)	3/28/2002 11:46:28 AM
From: elpolvo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 65232

OOFie- you start out with what looks like a copy and paste from a dictionary but it begins with definitions number 3 and 4. (selective viewing of the facts??) then you add "see Clinton" which is obviously an invention of your own and not part of the dictionary definition. (creative distortion??) and then the rest of your post goes on to describe exactly what you did in the first part of yer post. you are a real piece of work dude. all i did was post a common dictionary definition of the word liberal. i'd hate to see what would happen here if i actually posted an opinion. i'm thinking of posting the dictionary definition of conservative but i don't think you could handle it. maybe you ought to go look it up in private first to prepare yers elf. jajajajajajajajaja! -polvo