Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stribe30 who wrote (75811)	3/28/2002 3:33:08 PM
From: AK2004	Respond to of 275872

stribe <edited> re: it wasnt AMD who posted this report -- it was AMDZone.com. I am on your side and that is exactly what I meant. Even though that pro-Intel is not sufficient reason to ignore they seems to use politics (negative feelings against AA) against model numbers rather than it's validity. It was low. Their report contradicted itself (small sample): 1) can not use frequency as index yet can not compare model numbers to frequency 2) performance is more important yet can not use benchmarks because they can change 3) can not use specific benchmarks yet those that favor intel can be used 4) they did not even give a reasonable attempt to justify one benchmark over another that is software market analysis It is of course a complete BS but they through around AA name as to proove on AA's reputation or lack of such I am not sure though if amd would get any benefit out of it or it would just put some FUD in buyers heart. I think FUD is what intel is counting on Regards -Albert