Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Poet who wrote (5268)	3/28/2002 6:25:55 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

I just love it when you equivocate. That was NOT equivocation. That was clarifying your misunderstanding. So there. I'll be interested to hear what you two come up with vis a vis that argument. Me too. :-) BUT just to start the ball rolling: Taxpayers are the people who pay for gov't. It's their money that makes the whole thing go. Why should those getting a free ride on the backs of the productive parts of society get to determine how money they did not contribute get spent? This is not an idea totally without precedent. In the early Republic, when men were men and patriots were true, only property owners voted. This was the case in England until about the middle of the 19th century. And felons can't vote.