Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (163156)	3/29/2002 4:19:25 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

bmw re: is the one criticizing megahertz no matter how imperfect QS may be one always knows that 1800+ is slower than 2000+. You can not say say the same for P4's GHz. Hence there is a benefit in QS re: Since they are making efforts towards TPI, then that automatically means that they recognize that QuantiSpeed is not the long term viable solution. So your statement should equally apply to AMD, but you would like it to apply to Intel instead. well, that is exactly what I was talking about that is working on a better alternative to replace currentt approach with sufficient benefit to justify that change. Regards -Albert