Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (163210)	3/29/2002 5:52:08 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

bmw re: Aren't you the same albert kovalyov that said this: yes I am and I find no contradiction here. The formula is driven of amd freq but was designed to show relative performance to intel offerings re: but now you are saying that AMD is doing their labeling based on the Intel established standard. I guess you were not listening then. Right from the start it was made clear that model numbers were designed to deal with the fact that athlons are simply more efficient. In order to eliminate discrepancy amd created a model number formula that is driven by athlon frequency and within some specified performance range of p4. re: Why the sudden flip-flop, aLbeRT? you are having more problems with basic English comprehension? Look-up word "relative" that I was using all the time together with "performance" -Albert