SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (5595)3/29/2002 9:02:41 PM
From: Ish  Respond to of 21057
 
He's a sick person and I'll let it ride.



To: Lane3 who wrote (5595)3/29/2002 9:31:31 PM
From: Solon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
Btw, Karen...

A couple of weeks ago, you were discussing ridiculing ridiculous ideas with Neocon. I was busy at the time--and did not in any case wish to intrude. Did you ever reach a resolution?

To the best of my recollection, Neo wished to claim that strongly felt ideas ought to have a certain immunity from honest ridicule, especially if they were of a religious nature. Unlike Neo, I think that the natural response to ridiculous ideas is ridicule, although it is not a necessary response in all contexts or situations. Did the two of you settle it out?



To: Lane3 who wrote (5595)3/29/2002 10:14:45 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
Ish is clearly in violation
let us see if people can follow their own rules

1. Revelation of intimate, personal, or private information about other posters or posting PMs containing such or threatening to do so or alluding
to the existence of such IS SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED!
This specifically includes assertions involving cyberflirtation. Whether the assertions
made are true or not is irrelevant. The assertions need not have been made on this thread if the other party is a poster on this thread. No
warnings will be given prior to banning for this offense.

Ah the suspense. Almost as good as a movie.