Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (5662)	3/29/2002 10:19:43 PM
From: Ish	Respond to of 21057

If I am, so be it.

To: epicure who wrote (5662)	3/29/2002 10:52:58 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

I didn't see any details or "Revelation of intimate, personal, or private information about other posters or posting PMs containing such or threatening to do so or alluding to the existence of such IS SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED!" by Ish. Did you? What was it, I'm curious. Was it compromising information based on a purported sexual relationship, or what? I saw Ish say that CL had PM'd him, and I saw Ish's editorial opinion that CL is a pervert. What is your point, exactly? That threatening to reveal intimate exchanges and private information is okay? That you don't like Ish? That you feel it was wrong of Ish to tell that CL PM'd him? That he thinks CL is a pervert? That you can't pass up an opportunity to make a dig? What IS your point, X? I wonder if it has anything to do with resenting Ish's defense of Edwarda, whom you so disliked. I suppose you'll be back soon whining that people on SI aren't nice enough for you. What with your high niceness standards and all.