Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (5718)	3/29/2002 11:13:14 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

But X, it is NOT "precisely like another case." Your assertion that it is is gratuitous. At least not where I saw. But maybe you can explain to me how it is like the previous case. This is what I said. If you respond, I will know how Ish's case is like a previous one, and how it isn't: I didn't see any details or "Revelation of intimate, personal, or private information about other posters or posting PMs containing such or threatening to do so or alluding to the existence of such IS SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED!" by Ish. Did you? What was it, I'm curious. Was it compromising information based on a purported sexual relationship, or what? I saw Ish say that CL had PM'd him, and I saw Ish's editorial opinion that CL is a pervert. What is your point, exactly? That threatening to reveal intimate exchanges and private information is okay? That you don't like Ish? That you feel it was wrong of Ish to tell that CL PM'd him? That he thinks CL is a pervert? So HOW IS ISH SAYING THAT CL WAS SENDING HIM PM'S AND CALLING CL A PERVERT "EXACTLY LIKE A PREVIOUS CASE"? It isn't even approximately like a previous case. Ish is not stalking anybody who has begged not to be harassed by him, for starters. But rather than my telling how the cases are different, please show how they are "exactly the same." It's honest of you to admit "I can't say I am sorry it was him,", of your dig to Ish. As to whether your "interest" is in the consistency of rules-application in "these moderated threads," is equally honest.... well, you're being satirical, of course. Do, please, reply to my questions above so we can know whether Ish has been stalking and harassing CL for weeks, and threatening to reveal intimate, personal information about him garnered in a PM exchange.