Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (5734)	3/29/2002 11:37:11 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

Look, it's YOU who raised "an earlier case," not me, not Ish, not CL, not anybody but you. You made a claim, in a moment of nastiness you have implicitly admitted by admitting you were "glad it was [Ish]", that two cases were "exactly alike." I've indicated how they weren't "exactly alike," or even vaguely alike, because YOU, not I, YOU, made an unsupported assertion and negative characterization. I have no idea what "I'm not referring to a man" even means. Please try to express yourself more lucidly when being snide so it will be easier to understand your snideness. All that's happened here is that there was a conversation about whether CL should be banned. No one except CL was being treated uncivilly or nastily in the least, until you popped up with your snide tone. Of COURSE you won't answer any question designed to try and figure out what the heck you're being so snide about. Of course not. You're suddenly, mirabilis dictu, too busy being Ms. Goody Two Shoes to CL. Could anything be more Cloud Cuckoo Land? X, what is with you? What was the point of that nastiness? You don't LIKE it when it's pointed out. The X you want to show is the lovely, Chris Land Counseling one! So get yourself under control, why don't you, and show that one! It's lovely! As it is, you are like a faucet. Hot, Cold, Nasty, Nice, what will be next? It's a mystery!