Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (5759)	3/30/2002 12:47:44 AM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

It is not an obvious interpretation to me that saying that a PM was sent is posting of "Private information". My interpretation of the reference to "threatening", is made to the allusion to the existence of intimate, personal or private information. Where I see some similarities to the previous situations, what Ish said does not violate the rules, at least the way that the rules are specifically worded. 1. Revelation of intimate, personal, or private information about other posters or posting PMs containing such or threatening to do so or alluding to the existence of such IS SPECIFICALLY PROHIBITED! This specifically includes assertions involving cyberflirtation. Whether the assertions made are true or not is irrelevant. The assertions need not have been made on this thread if the other party is a poster on this thread. No warnings will be given prior to banning for this offense.