Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (5765)	3/30/2002 2:18:49 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 21057

A PM is per se Personal information it is a private communication disclosing the alleged receipt of one is disclosing a personal communication disclosing what was allegedly in one is disclosing what was private and personal This issue was gone over with other people on this thread- before the creation of this thread You may not think telling everyone about the receipt of a pm is relaying private information you may not think that disclosing alleged communications in a pm are private/personal I would disagree with you I don't have a problem with anyone saying anything they want about anyone they want, or disclosing all information they can get away with, outside the limits of the TOU- as long as that rule applies to everyone I am only really interested in the issue of selective enforcement