Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les H who wrote (157684)	3/30/2002 12:13:28 PM
From: Les H	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 436258

February chip sales flat sequentially, down 35% YoY nytimes.com they usually release these kinds of news during the week. how to double your money in 69,315 years nytimes.com argentina - savers force-converted to pesos and lose 75% of their life savings nytimes.com

To: Les H who wrote (157684)	3/30/2002 12:17:43 PM
From: Stock Farmer	Respond to of 436258

Yes, he's saying the bill is unfair 'cause the estimate is wrong. Forget for the moment that the current estimate [0] is also wrong, but in a direction favorable to the company. I find the whole argument against S.1940 to be "if we disclose what stock options are costing shareholders, then folks wouldn't pay as much to buy shares". The words "conspiracy to defraud" spring to mind.