Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (5878)	3/30/2002 3:55:21 PM
From: E	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

Shall I compile a list of queries I have made in a vain attempt to seek clarification of your statements? It would be easy. Would you be so kind as to answer the queries? It would be appreciated. Before I compile the list of clarification-seeking queries, please do indicate a willingness to help me understand by replying to them. It seems only fair, imo. I am also puzzled as to why you think posting to you or to anyone else if you (or anyone else) behaves badly, imo, and replying to their replies to me, is "making trouble." You raised something, why object to discussing it? You have yourself said that it is good to speak out against caddish and boorish behavior, even if the causation for the boorish or caddish behavior may be entangled. I assume the only unwarranted and unjustifiable behavior to which you object isn't of the caddish or boorish variety. So I spoke out against what i considered unwarranted and unjustifiable behavior, you replied evasively, imo, and I have unsuccessfully sought clarification. "I have tried to respond to your extremely numerous posts to me" refers to number, not to content, which is frustrating. I have basically only learned that you think threateners should have their privacy protected by the threatened and that you aren't interested in PM's, paradoxically enough.