Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chris land who wrote (5917)	3/30/2002 5:40:29 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

"I love 3d life, where you can shoot them" I'm going to put that up to the thread founders. And I'll recuse myself. Which could result in a tie vote. <i.What E wrote was the entire thing, BUT......you already knew that didn't you? No, I don't know that. I've asked Ish to give you permission to post the whole thing. Or you can give him permission. SI Jeff can verfy the accuracy of the information. And, as I understand SI rules on posting PMs, if one side or the other gives permission, there is no violation of SI policy. Did you ban me because i broke the TOU or did you ban me just out of pure hatred towards me???? Oh, I have no lost love for you. I did receive a number of requests before that happened, though. When the poll results came in, you won. Not because everyone loves you so much; because they want the header rules adhered to. Have you given me any reason whatsoever to confide in you as a just judge in this matter???? As I said, I will recuse myself.

To: Chris land who wrote (5917)	3/30/2002 6:28:13 PM
From: Poet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

Chris, Laz has recused himself. The following post by Ish: I love 3d life, where you can shoot them",--Ish I personally find offensive because I think guns do far more harm than good. However I just don't see it as a violation of the thread rules here. I interpret it as an over-the-top expression of frustration with you, but not a threat. I had asked you earlier today why you were here. It's my impression that you arrived here because your name had been mentioned, probably in a negative light. I know if my name had been mentioned negatively on a thread, I'd go looking for "justice", so I can empathize a bit. However, though I never knew Edwarda, I think --- as a Christian--- that your statements about her were ungenerous and resulted in the opening of many peoples' wounds. In this season of atonement, I ask that you look at your motivations for being here, at the pain and anger that your statements have caused, and move on.