SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (6006)3/31/2002 11:08:17 AM
From: Poet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
Good morning JC, and Happy Easter to you.

As you've realized, this seems to be the place where all the SI atheists and agnostics (and whatever the Hell else they call themselves -g) hang out. Most of them are my friends and I accept their views, even when I disagree with them.

However, on the topic of faith, I think arguments about logic, provability and the scientific method are completely off the mark. To me, faith in God exists outside all the usual arguments. If people don't have it, that's cool. For those of us who do, we know what we have. We're happy that we have it.

It's unimportant how many scientists have faith, or how many politicians, philosophers or poets have it. It's unimportant whether or not the faithful are smart or male or people of color. We are not better because we have faith and we are not worse.



To: J. C. Dithers who wrote (6006)3/31/2002 12:49:10 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
You are wrong
I do not "Believe" it
I would not worship it
I would not tithe to it
and I wouldn't do anything in the Big Bang Book just because it was in the Big Bang Book

It is an interesting theory
I don't totally understand it, but it interests me
If something else comes along that is also interesting I will learn about that

Would it be rational to "beleive" this? No
what is rational is to think, hmmmm, interesting theory
if you or anyone out there is "beleiving" in theories then you missed the main point in introductory science, the one about "theories"