SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (49228)4/1/2002 11:00:37 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 65232
 
Enron and Bush: the Mystery Deepens, Energy Papers Yield More Questions

By David Callaway
CBS.MarketWatch.com
March 28, 2002

SAN FRANCISCO (CBS.MW) - Think the flap over the Bush administration and Enron is winding down? Think again.

The release by the administration of thousands of pages of documents related to its energy task force last year has only heightened speculation that the Bush team is hiding something by refusing to provide logs of Vice President Dick Cheney's meetings with energy executives.

While 11,000 pages of documents were released on court orders this week, most were heavily edited to blank out any useful information, particularly e-mails. The government continues to hold back an additional 15,000 documents, citing privacy and security concerns, as well as the mysterious Cheney logs.

Cobbling from what little information was made available, reporters were able to quickly establish that Secretary of the Energy Spencer Abraham met almost exclusively with energy executives while helping formulate taskforce policy last year, while ignoring any submissions from environmental or consumer groups.

Now, the idea that a Republican administration would be pro-business at the expense of the little guy is hardly a secret. In fact, I think it's written in the party's charter.

The practice, however, goes to the heart of what I said back in January when the whole Enron (ENRNQ: news, chart, profile) mess broke in Washington. That the fallout will include a series of disclosures that will reveal in stark detail just how the current administration prefers to do business, which is exclusively with its industry buddies and a sneering disregard for the public at large. So far, so true.

But the question remains. What could they possibly be hiding?

Industry executives are baffled. Those who met with Cheney said they didn't recommend anything different than they've publicly requested for years. Consumer groups and environmentalists don't have a clue either.

For an administration that has taken such a tough stand against Arthur Andersen in the Enron case, indicting the company and threatening the livelihood of 85,000 staff worldwide over documents shredded by a few dozen, the fact that it is trying itself to shield documents from the public is glaringly ironic.

It's part of a pattern of holding back information that not only taints the administration with Enron, but leads to skepticism about any of its other motives, such as its messing with the Clean Air Act or its developing a shadow government in case of attacks on Washington.

Now, three months after the whole thing erupted, we're still getting new bombshells on a weekly basis. The most recent one is that Secretary of the Army Thomas White, a former senior Enron executive, not only kept options on shares worth several millions of dollars when he left Enron last May - possibly violating terms of an ethics agreement - but that he was in touch with Enron on a frequent basis as it began to collapse in October.

White made 13 calls to the company in October and sold about $3 million in stock during the month. That's pretty involved, especially at a time when he was supposedly coordinating the invasion of Afghanistan.

White on Wednesday offered to resign if the flap over his Enron ties hampers his ability to do his job. So far at least, he retains the support of Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld. But the fact he would even feel the need to make the offer at a time when his job is so important to the country shows just how hard the administration has been hit by this scandal.

From the very beginning, the Enron story has been much more than a business story about a failed company. It has been a story of greed and corruption on such a scale that both Washington and Wall Street have had to make changes to the way they operate that would have been unthinkable a year ago.

Who would have guessed before Enron that Bush would agree to campaign finance reform? Who would have guessed that the accounting industry would finally succumb to pressure to abandon its inherent conflicts of interest in auditing and consulting, or that Wall Street would abandon pro forma earnings?

And we haven't even gotten to the highlight of the show yet, the indictment of the Enron executives themselves, their trials, their testimonies, and their bombshells.

No, this story has legs. And as long as any of the players in this drama refuse to come clean - including at the White House -- it will continue to astound us with fresh revelations, one at a time.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (49228)4/1/2002 11:32:41 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 65232
 
Fed's Parry Says Inflation Tame, Suggests Rates Won't Rise Soon

By Liz Enochs and Brendan Murray

San Francisco, March 28 (Bloomberg) -- Tame inflation gives U.S. central bankers room to be ``thoughtful'' about when to raise interest rates while allowing economic growth to accelerate, said Robert Parry, president of the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank.

``We can be deliberative as we approach this issue of when policy has to change and how aggressive it has to be,'' Parry said in an interview yesterday. ``I don't think inflation shows, or indicates, that there is any imminent problem.''

The economy probably pulled out of recession in December and is likely to grow this year at a rate that exceeds the Fed's forecast of 2.5 percent to 3 percent, he said. Parry expects unemployment to fall as businesses resume hiring, which in turn will boost consumer spending.

``I'm pretty optimistic and confident that we have turned around and the economy is going to be expanding,'' he said.

Parry cited last year's series of Fed rate cuts as a reason for his forecast. Policy makers reduced the benchmark overnight lending rate 11 times to a 40-year low of 1.75 percent. In their two meetings this year, central bankers have let the rate stand.

``You can analytically reach the conclusion that monetary policy is in a position now that is completely appropriate,'' said Parry, a non-voting member of the Fed's policy-setting Open Market Committee. ``At some point in the future, we're going to have to turn the dial a bit. It's just when this process begins and how rapidly it's likely to be that is the real question mark.''

Other Fed Officials Agree

Parry is the third Federal Reserve bank president this week to say policy makers aren't in any hurry to start raising interest rates as the economy recovers from what may have been the mildest post-war recession on record.

The economy grew at a 1.7 percent rate in the final three months of last year after shrinking at a 1.3 percent pace in the third quarter and expanding at a 0.3 percent rate in the second. Since World War II, no other recession, as determined by the business cycle dating committee of the National Bureau of Economic Research, has had only one quarter of contraction.

At a financial services forum in Prague this week, bank presidents Robert McTeer of Dallas and Anthony Santomero of Philadelphia, said it was too early to start speculating on when rates will start to rise. Both are voting members of the FOMC.

``Sooner or later, as the economy gathers momentum and gets stronger, an adjustment will have to be made, but I'm in no hurry,'' McTeer said in an interview Tuesday.

Inflation in Check

One reason the Fed officials cite for their sanguine approach is tame inflation, especially the core rate of price indexes, which exclude the costs of food and energy. So far this year, the Labor Department's core consumer price index is rising at a 2.6 percent annual pace, compared with 3.7 percent through February 2001.

``I don't feel, at this point, concern about inflation is very high on the list,'' Parry said.

That means businesses are still finding it tough to raise prices, which may crimp earnings, he said. ``This turnaround in the economy also includes a highly competitive environment where inflation is relatively low and price competitiveness makes it difficult to add sharply to profits,'' Parry said.

The recession that began in March 2001 probably ended in December and was ``relatively shallow,'' he said. ``We're beginning to see pretty convincing signs that the economy is expanding.''

Economic Growth

He said he expected gross domestic product to rise at an annual rate of more than 3.5 percent in the first quarter, which ends Sunday. He didn't give a specific forecast for the year, saying ``it's a number that is certainly well above that range that we came out with at our January FOMC meeting, which was 2.5 to 3 percent.''

Consumer spending, which accounts for two-thirds of the economy, ``continues to surprise us,'' he said. Spending rose 0.4 percent in January after surging in the fourth quarter at the fastest pace since 1998.

``I don't see any reason at this point to be pessimistic about prospects for consumer spending,'' Parry said, citing this week's Conference Board confidence index, which posted the largest gain since the last recession ended in 1991.

Businesses may not be as quick as consumers to provide a boost to the economy, he said. ``The prospects seem to have improved, but it isn't at this point a slam-dunk that we're moving into a period of vigorous capital spending,'' he said.

That may explain why company executives paint a different picture of the economy than he does, he said. ``You're going to see as companies get to higher levels of capacity utilization they'll be more productive and their unit costs will be somewhat lower and the profit picture will turn around,'' probably by the end of the year, he said.

Hiring to Resume

When that happens, businesses will be more willing to hire again, which will help drive down the unemployment rate. Joblessness rose to a 6 1/2-year high of 5.8 percent in December and fell to 5.5 percent last month.

``The underlying trends in my view would be that we're probably past the peak and coming down,'' Parry said.

Rising gasoline prices may put a dent in consumer spending, he said. Crude oil prices have risen 30 percent since December, reaching a six-month high close to $26 a barrel this quarter.

That's ``certainly an unfavorable development in the sense that it will put pressures on inflation,'' Parry said. ``I think almost everyone is allocating more of their budget to gasoline at this point then they had to several weeks ago.''

Home sales, which usually decline in an economic downturn, remained surprisingly strong this time, he said. U.S. consumers bought a record 6.15 million new and existing homes in 2001.

Housing is ``worth watching because it's been so strong and it's conceivable that we will reach a point where the strength of housing is not going to be the same as it has been,'' Parry said. ``Of course, if the economy continues to expand and jobs become more plentiful and people earning more money, maybe housing is going to stay pretty strong.''