Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Oil & Gas Companies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eva who wrote (8787)	4/1/2002 5:25:04 PM
From: Kerm Yerman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24922

Eva / Elk Resources Just saw a comment at the subject location Subject 10357 (Reply 15549) A lot of people in this group own shares in Elk. You might want to try there. The comment amounted to shares of the company selling at about 1/2 net asset value. I will assume a big part of that value is tied up in the East Lost Hills exploration play in California where they apparently are having trouble getting the reserves out of the ground. Post the same question there and I bet you will get a few qualified comments from shareholders.

To: Eva who wrote (8787)	4/2/2002 12:22:32 PM
From: SofaSpud	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24922

Hi Eva, I've been in Elk for a little over a year, and so am obviously underwater. There are lots of things I like about the company (and still do), but IMHO they are paying the price right now for not performing to expectations. The gold standard is growth, and Elk didn't deliver. Considered a relatively "gassy" company, Elk saw established (proven + half probable) gas reserves decline 14.5%, from 11,905 kboe in 2000 (@10:1) to 10,175 kboe. Yes, oil reserves increased 4.5%, but overall established reserves declined 5%. This is a brutally short-term business. Lots of times good companies get beaten up for missing estimates when they have good excuses; sometimes, however, missing is a sign of things to come. There may be a penalty for debt, too -- roughly $80 mil. on a $100 mil. line. The fact that they've got $20 mil. room is good, but IMHO $80 mil. is high for a company this size. Look at URC (which Kerm mentioned today), who are doing almost exactly the same production (again @10:1) on under $30 mil. debt (before last month's acquisition). The market tends to shoot first and ask questions later. I haven't spoken to the company yet this year, so I don't have any insight as to their spin on things. I take some comfort in their NAV 15%, which at $6 suggests that the market is overdone. Nevertheless, I've learned (at considerable cost) that the market is often right. If you're thinking of buying, considerable DD is in order. JMO, but hopefully some food for thought.