Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (163333)	4/2/2002 6:12:47 AM
From: cordob	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

On the P4 side, there is no chance IMO that the injunction is going to be the outcome. Intel would have negotiated a settlement by now, if Intel's lawyers thought that a loss was a possibility. They ARE negotiating, Joe. They are sitting down for it tomorrow. If they fail to reach an agreement, it will be decided in the court in july. The mills turn over slowly. It is like saying Rambus could not stop Micron making sdram and DDR chips (if they do not agree to a royalty), IF these chips are found to infringe on Rambus IP. In the case of INGR infringement is not an issue any more apparently, just the wish of Intel for Intergraph to disappear before damages can be ascertained. However, Intergraph is profitable at what they do now (they were pushed out of their original business by Intel) and is not going away. And as to the press, don't worry that will come:) Cheers Cor