SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (6365)4/2/2002 3:04:04 PM
From: Bald Eagle  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
Well, that's one way to avoid admitting that YOU WERE WRONG! An apology would be nice for the "mathematically impaired" comment, but somehow I don't expect one from you.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (6365)4/2/2002 3:19:44 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
?????

Oh, cut the crap, TP.

He had full power to stop it had he chose to do so. He did not do so. Guilty as charged.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (6365)4/2/2002 5:35:30 PM
From: Ish  Respond to of 21057
 
Clinton did have the line item veto so he could have vetoed the part of the bill you don't like.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News